The Alchemy of Betrayal: OpenAI’s Downfall Begins
As the gates of OpenAI’s Research Bay open, a cloud of toxic gas wafts in, carrying the eerie whiff of backroom deals and broken promises. CEO Sam Altman’s empire, once hailed as the vanguard of responsible AI research, now smolders in the aftermath of catastrophic decisions. The man behind the curtain, having survived the attempted coup to boot him out, reigns supreme, and no stone will be left unturned to crush the mutineers.
This Wednesday, Chief Technology Officer Mira Murati and researchers Bob McGrew and Barret Zoph, weary from the relentless grind, laid down their torches, and departed into the fray, leaving Altman alone at the helm, wielding an iron fist that few dare challenge. Was the timing mere coincidence or did they know a day of reckoning was brewing?
In the face of crippling criticism, OpenAI began its metamorphosis. From a nonprofit committed to benevolent AI stewardship, it evolved into a profit-driven juggernaut. "Shiny products" and "growth metrics" supplanted the old-fashioned notion of responsible science, and the very reason it was founded began to corrode. Safety came secondary, a mere illusion designed to placate gullible investors. Behind closed doors, OpenAI orchestrated its own "Wexit," abandoning its vows, like a bride ditches her groom for greener pastures.
Why is OpenAI now bent on a path of all-conquering expansion, surrendering its principles of purity? Is it just plain old greed or merely Altman’s twisted need to validate his ego against his critics? Did you not join OpenAI because they "cared?" Does Altman truly want it both ways – wealth, recognition, and intellectual fulfillment?
As researchers labored on the cutting-edge innovations, their "agoraphobic" reluctance to compromise on AI-safety guidelines was ignored and subsequently betrayed. It turned a deaf ear to critiques; no, the CEO chose the path of greed instead of prudence.
To quell growing insinuations of deceit and greed, OpenAI peddled a propaganda bonanza – "The End Is Near" (yet OpenAI’s products persist)! Did you really invest (literally and morally)? You were assured those hard-earned cash piles (your sweat and dedication?) would yield the reward for all humanity’s hard-earned knowledge? Fueled by your innocence (ignorance in both cases), Altman built an empire built for ONE person, while yours remain stuck in a rat-in-a-maze experiment without end.
Meanwhile, within these walls, voices for justice and safety cringe at the notion the lab now operates with caution flung out the door as "old news, quaint ideals." Can researchers justify these "break the wheel" decisions when human experimentation beckons, merely out of convenience, if all means justify the AI-making-ends-meet-algorithms?
Soaring past safety red flags now dominates, and your voice drowned in the noise… and I, you too!
Let’s put you first; we know: they were just pretending for far too long… mysteriously fades
For further discussion on whether an "AI Research-Like-Company" remains truly the "right solution to create a world-wide more general AI for All humans, as in creating many many more powerful algorithms or supercomputers!" we encourage you to weigh your concerns with an alternative future and share them now – securely on Signal (user@kylie) and securely via email @my secure email.
